Comments on: UbuntuOne trademark- well, duh http://tieguy.org/blog/2009/05/14/ubuntuone-trademark-well-duh/ Ramblings on software, law, and the spaces in between. Wed, 23 May 2012 07:48:43 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: mako's Bookmarks on Delicious http://tieguy.org/blog/2009/05/14/ubuntuone-trademark-well-duh/comment-page-1/#comment-29272 mako's Bookmarks on Delicious Tue, 02 Jun 2009 12:41:44 +0000 http://tieguy.org/blog/?p=1572#comment-29272 <!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] UbuntuOne trademark- well, duh (Luis Villa) SAVE [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--> Kramer auto Pingback[...] UbuntuOne trademark- well, duh (Luis Villa) SAVE [...]

]]> By: Stoffe http://tieguy.org/blog/2009/05/14/ubuntuone-trademark-well-duh/comment-page-1/#comment-29233 Stoffe Mon, 25 May 2009 16:03:52 +0000 http://tieguy.org/blog/?p=1572#comment-29233 "Java" Just slap it onto everything, confusing consumers endlessly. Just because it didn't work - at all- for Sun, no reason this shouldn't be different... “Java”

Just slap it onto everything, confusing consumers endlessly. Just because it didn’t work – at all- for Sun, no reason this shouldn’t be different…

]]> By: Luis http://tieguy.org/blog/2009/05/14/ubuntuone-trademark-well-duh/comment-page-1/#comment-29197 Luis Fri, 15 May 2009 12:14:40 +0000 http://tieguy.org/blog/?p=1572#comment-29197 I have looked in the past; most of my comments are fairly involved so I've not shared them. Perhaps some time in the fall I'll do a more detailed analysis as part of the paper I'm working on. I have looked in the past; most of my comments are fairly involved so I’ve not shared them. Perhaps some time in the fall I’ll do a more detailed analysis as part of the paper I’m working on.

]]> By: Peteris Krisjanis http://tieguy.org/blog/2009/05/14/ubuntuone-trademark-well-duh/comment-page-1/#comment-29196 Peteris Krisjanis Fri, 15 May 2009 11:51:30 +0000 http://tieguy.org/blog/?p=1572#comment-29196 Do I am really only one to see it as storm in teapot? Wow, Cannonical owns Ubuntu trademark. Guess what - it is their name, they came up with it! And I am all for Cannonical to earn money. Because they put Ubuntu together. Yes, community drives some of processes, but in the end, Cannonical people set trends - for better or worse. It is not a issue for me. Do I am really only one to see it as storm in teapot? Wow, Cannonical owns Ubuntu trademark. Guess what – it is their name, they came up with it! And I am all for Cannonical to earn money. Because they put Ubuntu together. Yes, community drives some of processes, but in the end, Cannonical people set trends – for better or worse.

It is not a issue for me.

]]> By: Advogato - Recent Blog Entries http://tieguy.org/blog/2009/05/14/ubuntuone-trademark-well-duh/comment-page-1/#comment-29195 Advogato - Recent Blog Entries Fri, 15 May 2009 04:01:48 +0000 http://tieguy.org/blog/?p=1572#comment-29195 <!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] Syndicated 2009-05-14 22:00:28 from Luis Villa's Blog [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--> Kramer auto Pingback[...] Syndicated 2009-05-14 22:00:28 from Luis Villa’s Blog [...]

]]> By: Rahul Sundaram http://tieguy.org/blog/2009/05/14/ubuntuone-trademark-well-duh/comment-page-1/#comment-29193 Rahul Sundaram Thu, 14 May 2009 23:09:41 +0000 http://tieguy.org/blog/?p=1572#comment-29193 Only slightly related and not as a comparison but have you looked at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal:Trademark_guidelines I would appreciate any suggestion for improvements to Fedora Advisory Board list (IIRC you are still subscribed to that). Only slightly related and not as a comparison but have you looked at

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal:Trademark_guidelines

I would appreciate any suggestion for improvements to Fedora Advisory Board list (IIRC you are still subscribed to that).

]]>