<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: firefox nitpicks, revisited</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/12/08/firefox-nitpicks-revisited/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/12/08/firefox-nitpicks-revisited/</link>
	<description>Ramblings on software, law, and the spaces in between.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 11:08:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregarius &#187; Planet GNOME</title>
		<link>http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/12/08/firefox-nitpicks-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-26037</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregarius &#187; Planet GNOME</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 03:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/12/08/firefox-nitpicks-revisited/#comment-26037</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] Luis Villa: firefox nitpicks, revisited [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dev.wp-plugins.org/wiki/Kramer"><img src="http://tieguy.org/blog/wp-content/plugins/kramer.php?kramer=gif-icon" class="technorati-balloon" alt="Kramer auto Pingback" style="border:0;" /></a>[...] Luis Villa: firefox nitpicks, revisited [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: katzj: Firefox 3 in Fedora</title>
		<link>http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/12/08/firefox-nitpicks-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-26021</link>
		<dc:creator>katzj: Firefox 3 in Fedora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 03:38:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/12/08/firefox-nitpicks-revisited/#comment-26021</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] about switching (back) to Epiphany full-time, but Firefox 3 is looking pretty good and I agree with Luis&#039;s general sentiment of it just feeling like it fits in better now.(Post a new [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dev.wp-plugins.org/wiki/Kramer"><img src="http://tieguy.org/blog/wp-content/plugins/kramer.php?kramer=gif-icon" class="technorati-balloon" alt="Kramer auto Pingback" style="border:0;" /></a>[...] about switching (back) to Epiphany full-time, but Firefox 3 is looking pretty good and I agree with Luis&#8217;s general sentiment of it just feeling like it fits in better now.(Post a new [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luis</title>
		<link>http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/12/08/firefox-nitpicks-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-25958</link>
		<dc:creator>Luis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 22:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/12/08/firefox-nitpicks-revisited/#comment-25958</guid>
		<description>Hah. Thanks ;) And good luck on the webkit stuff; certainly I hope it works out as you think it might.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hah. Thanks ;) And good luck on the webkit stuff; certainly I hope it works out as you think it might.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xan</title>
		<link>http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/12/08/firefox-nitpicks-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-25957</link>
		<dc:creator>Xan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 22:05:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/12/08/firefox-nitpicks-revisited/#comment-25957</guid>
		<description>Sorry about the elections results btw. 18 people not voting for you, what a shame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry about the elections results btw. 18 people not voting for you, what a shame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xan</title>
		<link>http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/12/08/firefox-nitpicks-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-25956</link>
		<dc:creator>Xan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 21:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/12/08/firefox-nitpicks-revisited/#comment-25956</guid>
		<description>Luis: very true. I honestly don&#039;t think it&#039;s possible to beat Firefox in their own game with the manpower Epiphany has. My personal opinion is that Epiphany/WebKit could give the project the differentiator it needs and the ability to do some deep integration that is far from easy to achieve with Gecko. That&#039;s why I&#039;m spending my free time hacking on that, but of course it&#039;s only my personal opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Luis: very true. I honestly don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s possible to beat Firefox in their own game with the manpower Epiphany has. My personal opinion is that Epiphany/WebKit could give the project the differentiator it needs and the ability to do some deep integration that is far from easy to achieve with Gecko. That&#8217;s why I&#8217;m spending my free time hacking on that, but of course it&#8217;s only my personal opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luis</title>
		<link>http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/12/08/firefox-nitpicks-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-25954</link>
		<dc:creator>Luis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 23:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/12/08/firefox-nitpicks-revisited/#comment-25954</guid>
		<description>Xan: awesome. So now epiphany has to ask &#039;why us&#039;? I&#039;m afraid being a slight bit faster and a slight bit better integrated isn&#039;t the answer- it needs to figure out some really innovative bits that firefox can&#039;t do (or can only do slowly) to leap ahead. Doing prism in a more gnome-y way would be one such thing- I still strongly suggest it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Xan: awesome. So now epiphany has to ask &#8216;why us&#8217;? I&#8217;m afraid being a slight bit faster and a slight bit better integrated isn&#8217;t the answer- it needs to figure out some really innovative bits that firefox can&#8217;t do (or can only do slowly) to leap ahead. Doing prism in a more gnome-y way would be one such thing- I still strongly suggest it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xan</title>
		<link>http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/12/08/firefox-nitpicks-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-25945</link>
		<dc:creator>Xan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 17:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/12/08/firefox-nitpicks-revisited/#comment-25945</guid>
		<description>Regarding &quot;speed&quot;, when Epiphany starts using Gecko 1.9 (the version coming with FF3) it will take more or less the same amount of time to launch both browsers. Saying &quot;FF3 loads faster than epiphany&quot; does not really make much sense, the differences will be always quite marginal until Gecko is so massively optimized that the bottleneck starts to be the UI/other bits, which the browsers don&#039;t share.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding &#8220;speed&#8221;, when Epiphany starts using Gecko 1.9 (the version coming with FF3) it will take more or less the same amount of time to launch both browsers. Saying &#8220;FF3 loads faster than epiphany&#8221; does not really make much sense, the differences will be always quite marginal until Gecko is so massively optimized that the bottleneck starts to be the UI/other bits, which the browsers don&#8217;t share.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luis</title>
		<link>http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/12/08/firefox-nitpicks-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-25944</link>
		<dc:creator>Luis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 16:20:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/12/08/firefox-nitpicks-revisited/#comment-25944</guid>
		<description>Vax: oh... that focus problem (google-as-homepage) is the javascript problem? Then, yes, I hate it. A lot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vax: oh&#8230; that focus problem (google-as-homepage) is the javascript problem? Then, yes, I hate it. A lot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vax</title>
		<link>http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/12/08/firefox-nitpicks-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-25942</link>
		<dc:creator>Vax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 13:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/12/08/firefox-nitpicks-revisited/#comment-25942</guid>
		<description>The javascript focus problem bites me all the time since I use google as a home page. Creating a new window and hitting Ctrl+L lets you start entering a new address, but if google.com loads slowly then its javascript grabs focus for the search box while you&#039;re typing.

Also, I&#039;ve had problems with text boxes and focus. If you are ctrl-tabbing through tabs and you hit a page with focus in a textarea, you get stuck on that page until you switch the focus to another element.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The javascript focus problem bites me all the time since I use google as a home page. Creating a new window and hitting Ctrl+L lets you start entering a new address, but if google.com loads slowly then its javascript grabs focus for the search box while you&#8217;re typing.</p>
<p>Also, I&#8217;ve had problems with text boxes and focus. If you are ctrl-tabbing through tabs and you hit a page with focus in a textarea, you get stuck on that page until you switch the focus to another element.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luis</title>
		<link>http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/12/08/firefox-nitpicks-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-25941</link>
		<dc:creator>Luis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 12:24:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/12/08/firefox-nitpicks-revisited/#comment-25941</guid>
		<description>Michael: tab history definitely doesn&#039;t work here. To be clear, what I mean is that I right-click on a link, select &quot;open in new tab&quot;, and then I expect when that tab opens I should be able to hit &#039;back&#039; to go back to the page I started from. (For those seeing the problem in ffox2, the fix is the &lt;a href=&quot;https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/1859&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;tab history addon.&lt;/a&gt;

Havoc: I haven&#039;t noticed it, but maybe that is in part because I&#039;ve been (mostly) using desktop effects, which means I&#039;m fucked on focus anyway. Can&#039;t wait for iain to finish giving a proper window manager the necessary 3D features.

Emmanuele: You&#039;re right, but I didn&#039;t bother to comment on it because I think all the distros have a patch for that. Why it isn&#039;t upstream I have no idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael: tab history definitely doesn&#8217;t work here. To be clear, what I mean is that I right-click on a link, select &#8220;open in new tab&#8221;, and then I expect when that tab opens I should be able to hit &#8216;back&#8217; to go back to the page I started from. (For those seeing the problem in ffox2, the fix is the <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/1859" rel="nofollow">tab history addon.</a></p>
<p>Havoc: I haven&#8217;t noticed it, but maybe that is in part because I&#8217;ve been (mostly) using desktop effects, which means I&#8217;m fucked on focus anyway. Can&#8217;t wait for iain to finish giving a proper window manager the necessary 3D features.</p>
<p>Emmanuele: You&#8217;re right, but I didn&#8217;t bother to comment on it because I think all the distros have a patch for that. Why it isn&#8217;t upstream I have no idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

