<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: one last post about the Busybox/GPL case</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/09/20/one-last-post-about-the-busyboxgpl-case/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/09/20/one-last-post-about-the-busyboxgpl-case/</link>
	<description>Ramblings on software, law, and the spaces in between.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 07:48:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Desktop Search - Mugshot</title>
		<link>http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/09/20/one-last-post-about-the-busyboxgpl-case/comment-page-1/#comment-25003</link>
		<dc:creator>Desktop Search - Mugshot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 17:52:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/09/20/one-last-post-about-the-busyboxgpl-case/#comment-25003</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] Reader share:   Luis Villa: one last post about the Busybox/GPL case       Mark Radcliffe, of DLA Piper (I interview there on Monday, by coincidence) has a ‘view from [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dev.wp-plugins.org/wiki/Kramer"><img src="http://tieguy.org/blog/wp-content/plugins/kramer.php?kramer=gif-icon" class="technorati-balloon" alt="Kramer auto Pingback" style="border:0;" /></a>[...] Reader share:   Luis Villa: one last post about the Busybox/GPL case       Mark Radcliffe, of DLA Piper (I interview there on Monday, by coincidence) has a ‘view from [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Techdirt: Lawsuit Tests The Legal Status Of The GPL</title>
		<link>http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/09/20/one-last-post-about-the-busyboxgpl-case/comment-page-1/#comment-24981</link>
		<dc:creator>Techdirt: Lawsuit Tests The Legal Status Of The GPL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 22:03:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/09/20/one-last-post-about-the-busyboxgpl-case/#comment-24981</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] the SFLC&#039;s letters, leaving them little choice but to go to court. Another factor is the recent Jacobsen decision, which called into question the enforceability of open source software licenses. The SFLC may have [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dev.wp-plugins.org/wiki/Kramer"><img src="http://tieguy.org/blog/wp-content/plugins/kramer.php?kramer=gif-icon" class="technorati-balloon" alt="Kramer auto Pingback" style="border:0;" /></a>[...] the SFLC&#39;s letters, leaving them little choice but to go to court. Another factor is the recent Jacobsen decision, which called into question the enforceability of open source software licenses. The SFLC may have [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SFLC files first U.S. GPL violation lawsuit [LWN.net]</title>
		<link>http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/09/20/one-last-post-about-the-busyboxgpl-case/comment-page-1/#comment-24967</link>
		<dc:creator>SFLC files first U.S. GPL violation lawsuit [LWN.net]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 00:50:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/09/20/one-last-post-about-the-busyboxgpl-case/#comment-24967</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] was weak in a way which might impact all free/open licenses. I&#039;ve blogged about the case a bit here, here, and [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dev.wp-plugins.org/wiki/Kramer"><img src="http://tieguy.org/blog/wp-content/plugins/kramer.php?kramer=gif-icon" class="technorati-balloon" alt="Kramer auto Pingback" style="border:0;" /></a>[...] was weak in a way which might impact all free/open licenses. I&#8217;ve blogged about the case a bit here, here, and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ▷&#9655 NextCellPhones - Mobile News</title>
		<link>http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/09/20/one-last-post-about-the-busyboxgpl-case/comment-page-1/#comment-25028</link>
		<dc:creator>▷&#9655 NextCellPhones - Mobile News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Unknown, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/09/20/one-last-post-about-the-busyboxgpl-case/#comment-25028</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;about its violation of the license. Luis Villa suggests a couple of possible reasons they moved so quickly. One is that Monsoon failed to respond to the SFLC&#039;s letters, leaving them little choice but to go to court. Another factor is the recentJacobsen decision, which called into question the enforceability of open source software licenses. The SFLC may have felt its chances of winning on appeal were not as good with the Jacobsen case, which is more complicated and involves a less popular license. And so&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="technorati-balloon" href="http://www.technorati.com/cosmos/search.html?url="><img src="http://static.technorati.com/images/bubble_h17.gif" class="technorati-balloon" alt="links from Technorati" style="border:0;" /></a>about its violation of the license. Luis Villa suggests a couple of possible reasons they moved so quickly. One is that Monsoon failed to respond to the SFLC&#8217;s letters, leaving them little choice but to go to court. Another factor is the recentJacobsen decision, which called into question the enforceability of open source software licenses. The SFLC may have felt its chances of winning on appeal were not as good with the Jacobsen case, which is more complicated and involves a less popular license. And so</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Techdirt.</title>
		<link>http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/09/20/one-last-post-about-the-busyboxgpl-case/comment-page-1/#comment-25026</link>
		<dc:creator>Techdirt.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Unknown, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/09/20/one-last-post-about-the-busyboxgpl-case/#comment-25026</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;about its violation of the license. Luis Villa suggests a couple of possible reasons they moved so quickly. One is that Monsoon failed to respond to the SFLC&#039;s letters, leaving them little choice but to go to court. Another factor is the recentJacobsen decision, which called into question the enforceability of open source software licenses. The SFLC may have felt its chances of winning on appeal were not as good with the Jacobsen case, which is more complicated and involves a less popular license. And so&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="technorati-balloon" href="http://www.technorati.com/cosmos/search.html?url="><img src="http://static.technorati.com/images/bubble_h17.gif" class="technorati-balloon" alt="links from Technorati" style="border:0;" /></a>about its violation of the license. Luis Villa suggests a couple of possible reasons they moved so quickly. One is that Monsoon failed to respond to the SFLC&#8217;s letters, leaving them little choice but to go to court. Another factor is the recentJacobsen decision, which called into question the enforceability of open source software licenses. The SFLC may have felt its chances of winning on appeal were not as good with the Jacobsen case, which is more complicated and involves a less popular license. And so</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ▷&#9655 NextCellPhones - Mobile News</title>
		<link>http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/09/20/one-last-post-about-the-busyboxgpl-case/comment-page-1/#comment-25027</link>
		<dc:creator>▷&#9655 NextCellPhones - Mobile News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Unknown, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/09/20/one-last-post-about-the-busyboxgpl-case/#comment-25027</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;about its violation of the license. Luis Villa suggests a couple of possible reasons they moved so quickly. One is that Monsoon failed to respond to the SFLC&#039;s letters, leaving them little choice but to go to court. Another factor is the recentJacobsen decision, which called into question the enforceability of open source software licenses. The SFLC may have felt its chances of winning on appeal were not as good with the Jacobsen case, which is more complicated and involves a less popular license. And so&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="technorati-balloon" href="http://www.technorati.com/cosmos/search.html?url="><img src="http://static.technorati.com/images/bubble_h17.gif" class="technorati-balloon" alt="links from Technorati" style="border:0;" /></a>about its violation of the license. Luis Villa suggests a couple of possible reasons they moved so quickly. One is that Monsoon failed to respond to the SFLC&#8217;s letters, leaving them little choice but to go to court. Another factor is the recentJacobsen decision, which called into question the enforceability of open source software licenses. The SFLC may have felt its chances of winning on appeal were not as good with the Jacobsen case, which is more complicated and involves a less popular license. And so</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: www.theirway.net </title>
		<link>http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/09/20/one-last-post-about-the-busyboxgpl-case/comment-page-1/#comment-24992</link>
		<dc:creator>www.theirway.net </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Unknown, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/09/20/one-last-post-about-the-busyboxgpl-case/#comment-24992</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;about its violation of the license. Luis Villa suggests a couple of possible reasons they moved so quickly. One is that Monsoon failed to respond to the SFLC&#039;s letters, leaving them little choice but to go to court. Another factor is the recentJacobsen decision, which called into question the enforceability of open source software licenses. The SFLC may have felt its chances of winning on appeal were not as good with the Jacobsen case, which is more complicated and involves a less popular license. And so&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="technorati-balloon" href="http://www.technorati.com/cosmos/search.html?url="><img src="http://static.technorati.com/images/bubble_h17.gif" class="technorati-balloon" alt="links from Technorati" style="border:0;" /></a>about its violation of the license. Luis Villa suggests a couple of possible reasons they moved so quickly. One is that Monsoon failed to respond to the SFLC&#8217;s letters, leaving them little choice but to go to court. Another factor is the recentJacobsen decision, which called into question the enforceability of open source software licenses. The SFLC may have felt its chances of winning on appeal were not as good with the Jacobsen case, which is more complicated and involves a less popular license. And so</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

