<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: post-GPL link dump</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/07/01/post-gpl-link-dump/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/07/01/post-gpl-link-dump/</link>
	<description>Ramblings on software, law, and the spaces in between.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 07:48:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Dolan Dot Com &#187; GPLv3: Yes, I ignored it, let some dust settle, and now for my thoughts&#8230; if you care ;-)</title>
		<link>http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/07/01/post-gpl-link-dump/comment-page-1/#comment-24393</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Dolan Dot Com &#187; GPLv3: Yes, I ignored it, let some dust settle, and now for my thoughts&#8230; if you care ;-)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 17:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/07/01/post-gpl-link-dump/#comment-24393</guid>
		<description>[...] I obviously was not ignoring the GPLv3 launch, but by not blogging about it, I was simply taking Dan&#8217;s advice to &#8220;just chill&#8221;. In the meantime, Luis Villa has posted a print-worthy analysis of what all the GPLv3 hype, changes, hoopla are about. He also offers his views and commentary which I found refreshing. I recommend reading Luis&#8217; four part analysis starting with Part 1. After part 1, you will probably be hooked enough to take in Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, and Luis&#8217; post-analysis Link Dump. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I obviously was not ignoring the GPLv3 launch, but by not blogging about it, I was simply taking Dan&#8217;s advice to &#8220;just chill&#8221;. In the meantime, Luis Villa has posted a print-worthy analysis of what all the GPLv3 hype, changes, hoopla are about. He also offers his views and commentary which I found refreshing. I recommend reading Luis&#8217; four part analysis starting with Part 1. After part 1, you will probably be hooked enough to take in Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, and Luis&#8217; post-analysis Link Dump. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fedora People &#124; FedoraNEWS.ORG</title>
		<link>http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/07/01/post-gpl-link-dump/comment-page-1/#comment-24388</link>
		<dc:creator>Fedora People &#124; FedoraNEWS.ORG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 15:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/07/01/post-gpl-link-dump/#comment-24388</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] to support anything else than GNU make ? Source: Planet Fedora Categories: Planet Fedora    13:10  Luis Villa: post-GPL link dump  Several weeks worth of links, [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dev.wp-plugins.org/wiki/Kramer"><img src="http://tieguy.org/blog/wp-content/plugins/kramer.php?kramer=gif-icon" class="technorati-balloon" alt="Kramer auto Pingback" style="border:0;" /></a>[...] to support anything else than GNU make ? Source: Planet Fedora Categories: Planet Fedora    13:10  Luis Villa: post-GPL link dump  Several weeks worth of links, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luis</title>
		<link>http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/07/01/post-gpl-link-dump/comment-page-1/#comment-24387</link>
		<dc:creator>Luis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 11:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/07/01/post-gpl-link-dump/#comment-24387</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t listen to a radio station that was only one label; I&#039;m not sure why that should have to change now :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t listen to a radio station that was only one label; I&#8217;m not sure why that should have to change now :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ralpht</title>
		<link>http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/07/01/post-gpl-link-dump/comment-page-1/#comment-24384</link>
		<dc:creator>ralpht</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 03:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/07/01/post-gpl-link-dump/#comment-24384</guid>
		<description>Jamendo supports streaming and ratings, and they have a basic API. All of the music is CC of one variety or another.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jamendo supports streaming and ratings, and they have a basic API. All of the music is CC of one variety or another.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Fleck</title>
		<link>http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/07/01/post-gpl-link-dump/comment-page-1/#comment-24376</link>
		<dc:creator>John Fleck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2007 22:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/07/01/post-gpl-link-dump/#comment-24376</guid>
		<description>On the issue of the government-funded commons: If you look at the science enterprise, you&#039;ll see a model for a robust and quite advanced government-funded commons. It&#039;s not without its problems, but by and large the notion of funding for the production of basic science as a common good has a long and successful tradition in this country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the issue of the government-funded commons: If you look at the science enterprise, you&#8217;ll see a model for a robust and quite advanced government-funded commons. It&#8217;s not without its problems, but by and large the notion of funding for the production of basic science as a common good has a long and successful tradition in this country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Open Source Fedora</title>
		<link>http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/07/01/post-gpl-link-dump/comment-page-1/#comment-24395</link>
		<dc:creator>Open Source Fedora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Unknown, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/07/01/post-gpl-link-dump/#comment-24395</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;  Chitlesh GOORAH: do you use /sbin/* or /usr/sbin/* ?     - Jul 1, 2007      Thomas Vander Stichele: automake 1.10     - Jul 1, 2007      Luis Villa: post-GPL link dump     - Jul 1, 2007      Mike McGrath: The difference between Mom and Dad...     - Jul 1, 2007    &lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="technorati-balloon" href="http://www.technorati.com/cosmos/search.html?url="><img src="http://static.technorati.com/images/bubble_h17.gif" class="technorati-balloon" alt="links from Technorati" style="border:0;" /></a>  Chitlesh GOORAH: do you use /sbin/* or /usr/sbin/* ?     - Jul 1, 2007      Thomas Vander Stichele: automake 1.10     - Jul 1, 2007      Luis Villa: post-GPL link dump     - Jul 1, 2007      Mike McGrath: The difference between Mom and Dad&#8230;     - Jul 1, 2007    </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

