http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/06/28/gpl-v3-the-qa-part-3-companies/ Ramblings on software, law, and the spaces in between. Tue, 07 Feb 2012 19:01:16 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3 http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/06/28/gpl-v3-the-qa-part-3-companies/comment-page-1/#comment-28879 The FASTForward Blog » Dana Gardner: Enterprise 2.0 Blog: News, Coverage, and Commentary Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:50:34 +0000 http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/06/28/gpl-v3-the-qa-part-3-companies/#comment-28879 <!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] In Simon’s blog post he adds more insight: So the question I’m expecting to be faced with repeatedly over the next few weeks is, “will Sun use the GPLv3?” I think it’s likely we will use it, yes, but I’m not clear yet for which code and when. We’ll be carefully analysing the balance of benefits and risks in the released version of the GPLv3 and I’m not expecting to be in a position to bring a recommendation to our executive team for several weeks. I’m keen for us to take a leading position, though, even if some are sceptical of our motives. [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--> [...] In Simon’s blog post he adds more insight: So the question I’m expecting to be faced with repeatedly over the next few weeks is, “will Sun use the GPLv3?” I think it’s likely we will use it, yes, but I’m not clear yet for which code and when. We’ll be carefully analysing the balance of benefits and risks in the released version of the GPLv3 and I’m not expecting to be in a position to bring a recommendation to our executive team for several weeks. I’m keen for us to take a leading position, though, even if some are sceptical of our motives. [...]

]]> http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/06/28/gpl-v3-the-qa-part-3-companies/comment-page-1/#comment-27463 SunMink Without the Links Mon, 07 Jul 2008 15:24:07 +0000 http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/06/28/gpl-v3-the-qa-part-3-companies/#comment-27463 <!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] So the question I'm expecting to be faced with repeatedly over the next few weeks is, "will Sun use the GPLv3?" I think it's likely we will use it, yes, but I'm not clear yet for which code and when. We'll be carefully analysing the balance of benefits and risks in the released version of the GPLv3 and I'm not expecting to be in a position to bring a recommendation to our executive team for several weeks. I'm keen for us to take a leading position, though, even if some are sceptical of our motives. [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--> [...] So the question I’m expecting to be faced with repeatedly over the next few weeks is, “will Sun use the GPLv3?” I think it’s likely we will use it, yes, but I’m not clear yet for which code and when. We’ll be carefully analysing the balance of benefits and risks in the released version of the GPLv3 and I’m not expecting to be in a position to bring a recommendation to our executive team for several weeks. I’m keen for us to take a leading position, though, even if some are sceptical of our motives. [...]

]]> http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/06/28/gpl-v3-the-qa-part-3-companies/comment-page-1/#comment-24473 StumbleUpon » Your page is now on StumbleUpon! Tue, 10 Jul 2007 12:43:55 +0000 http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/06/28/gpl-v3-the-qa-part-3-companies/#comment-24473 <!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] Your page is on StumbleUpon [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--> [...] Your page is on StumbleUpon [...]

]]> http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/06/28/gpl-v3-the-qa-part-3-companies/comment-page-1/#comment-24397 Try this for size. -- odubtaig's comment on "It's finished. It's done. GPVv3 that is." | TalkBack on ZDNet Tue, 03 Jul 2007 01:33:02 +0000 http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/06/28/gpl-v3-the-qa-part-3-companies/#comment-24397 <!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] A fairly thorough explanation in 4 parts.http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/06/26/gpl-v3-the-qa-part-1-the-license/http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/06/26/gpl-v3-the-qa-part-2-developers/http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/06/28/gpl-v3-the-qa-part-3-companies/http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/06/28/gpl-v3-the-qa-part-4-odds-and-ends/ [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--> [...] A fairly thorough explanation in 4 parts.http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/06/26/gpl-v3-the-qa-part-1-the-license/http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/06/26/gpl-v3-the-qa-part-2-developers/http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/06/28/gpl-v3-the-qa-part-3-companies/http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/06/28/gpl-v3-the-qa-part-4-odds-and-ends/ [...]

]]> http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/06/28/gpl-v3-the-qa-part-3-companies/comment-page-1/#comment-24374 Luis Villa’s Blog / GPL v3, the Q&A: part 1- the license Sun, 01 Jul 2007 13:14:56 +0000 http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/06/28/gpl-v3-the-qa-part-3-companies/#comment-24374 [...] all parts: part 1, part 2, part 3, part 4.] Microsoft’s licenses are possibly more widely used, but only by a handful of pieces [...] [...] all parts: part 1, part 2, part 3, part 4.] Microsoft’s licenses are possibly more widely used, but only by a handful of pieces [...]

]]> http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/06/28/gpl-v3-the-qa-part-3-companies/comment-page-1/#comment-24372 Luis Villa’s Blog / GPL v3, the Q&A: part 2- developers Sun, 01 Jul 2007 13:12:08 +0000 http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/06/28/gpl-v3-the-qa-part-3-companies/#comment-24372 [...] all parts: part 1, part 2, part 3, part 4.] the license has been vetted by a lot of very skilled lawyers and a fair number of [...] [...] all parts: part 1, part 2, part 3, part 4.] the license has been vetted by a lot of very skilled lawyers and a fair number of [...]

]]> http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/06/28/gpl-v3-the-qa-part-3-companies/comment-page-1/#comment-24358 Boycott Novell » Better-than-expected Welcome to the New GPL Sat, 30 Jun 2007 17:44:21 +0000 http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/06/28/gpl-v3-the-qa-part-3-companies/#comment-24358 <!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] Part 3: Companies [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--> [...] Part 3: Companies [...]

]]> http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/06/28/gpl-v3-the-qa-part-3-companies/comment-page-1/#comment-24355 » Sun demurs from adopting GPL v3 for OpenSolaris, keeps CDDL only | Dana Gardner’s BriefingsDirect | ZDNet.com Sat, 30 Jun 2007 14:26:23 +0000 http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/06/28/gpl-v3-the-qa-part-3-companies/#comment-24355 [...] In Simon’s blog post he adds more insight: So the question I’m expecting to be faced with repeatedly over the next few weeks is, “will Sun use the GPLv3?” I think it’s likely we will use it, yes, but I’m not clear yet for which code and when. We’ll be carefully analysing the balance of benefits and risks in the released version of the GPLv3 and I’m not expecting to be in a position to bring a recommendation to our executive team for several weeks. I’m keen for us to take a leading position, though, even if some are sceptical of our motives. [...] [...] In Simon’s blog post he adds more insight: So the question I’m expecting to be faced with repeatedly over the next few weeks is, “will Sun use the GPLv3?” I think it’s likely we will use it, yes, but I’m not clear yet for which code and when. We’ll be carefully analysing the balance of benefits and risks in the released version of the GPLv3 and I’m not expecting to be in a position to bring a recommendation to our executive team for several weeks. I’m keen for us to take a leading position, though, even if some are sceptical of our motives. [...]

]]> http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/06/28/gpl-v3-the-qa-part-3-companies/comment-page-1/#comment-24354 Tribulaciones.org » Blog Archive » GPL v3 released Sat, 30 Jun 2007 14:21:25 +0000 http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/06/28/gpl-v3-the-qa-part-3-companies/#comment-24354 [...] 3. Companies [...] [...] 3. Companies [...]

]]> http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/06/28/gpl-v3-the-qa-part-3-companies/comment-page-1/#comment-24346 GPL V3 Q&A and changes within the Free Software Foundation « Engage the World Sat, 30 Jun 2007 08:15:39 +0000 http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/06/28/gpl-v3-the-qa-part-3-companies/#comment-24346 <!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] Part 3 - Companies [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--> [...] Part 3 – Companies [...]

]]>