<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GPL v3, the Q&#038;A: part 3- companies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/06/28/gpl-v3-the-qa-part-3-companies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/06/28/gpl-v3-the-qa-part-3-companies/</link>
	<description>Ramblings on law school in New York, free software, and the spaces in between.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 21:49:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: SunMink Without the Links</title>
		<link>http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/06/28/gpl-v3-the-qa-part-3-companies/#comment-27463</link>
		<dc:creator>SunMink Without the Links</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 15:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/06/28/gpl-v3-the-qa-part-3-companies/#comment-27463</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] So the question I'm expecting to be faced with repeatedly over the next few weeks is, "will Sun use the GPLv3?" I think it's likely we will use it, yes, but I'm not clear yet for which code and when. We'll be carefully analysing the balance of benefits and risks in the released version of the GPLv3 and I'm not expecting to be in a position to bring a recommendation to our executive team for several weeks. I'm keen for us to take a leading position, though, even if some are sceptical of our motives. [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dev.wp-plugins.org/wiki/Kramer"><img src="http://tieguy.org/blog/wp-content/plugins/kramer.php?kramer=gif-icon" class="technorati-balloon" alt="Kramer auto Pingback" style="border:0;" /></a>[...] So the question I&#8217;m expecting to be faced with repeatedly over the next few weeks is, &#8220;will Sun use the GPLv3?&#8221; I think it&#8217;s likely we will use it, yes, but I&#8217;m not clear yet for which code and when. We&#8217;ll be carefully analysing the balance of benefits and risks in the released version of the GPLv3 and I&#8217;m not expecting to be in a position to bring a recommendation to our executive team for several weeks. I&#8217;m keen for us to take a leading position, though, even if some are sceptical of our motives. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StumbleUpon &#187; Your page is now on StumbleUpon!</title>
		<link>http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/06/28/gpl-v3-the-qa-part-3-companies/#comment-24473</link>
		<dc:creator>StumbleUpon &#187; Your page is now on StumbleUpon!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 12:43:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/06/28/gpl-v3-the-qa-part-3-companies/#comment-24473</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] Your page is on StumbleUpon [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dev.wp-plugins.org/wiki/Kramer"><img src="http://tieguy.org/blog/wp-content/plugins/kramer.php?kramer=gif-icon" class="technorati-balloon" alt="Kramer auto Pingback" style="border:0;" /></a>[...] Your page is on StumbleUpon [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Try this for size. -- odubtaig's comment on "It's finished. It's done. GPVv3 that is." &#124; TalkBack on ZDNet</title>
		<link>http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/06/28/gpl-v3-the-qa-part-3-companies/#comment-24397</link>
		<dc:creator>Try this for size. -- odubtaig's comment on "It's finished. It's done. GPVv3 that is." &#124; TalkBack on ZDNet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 01:33:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/06/28/gpl-v3-the-qa-part-3-companies/#comment-24397</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] A fairly thorough explanation in 4 parts.http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/06/26/gpl-v3-the-qa-part-1-the-license/http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/06/26/gpl-v3-the-qa-part-2-developers/http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/06/28/gpl-v3-the-qa-part-3-companies/http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/06/28/gpl-v3-the-qa-part-4-odds-and-ends/ [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dev.wp-plugins.org/wiki/Kramer"><img src="http://tieguy.org/blog/wp-content/plugins/kramer.php?kramer=gif-icon" class="technorati-balloon" alt="Kramer auto Pingback" style="border:0;" /></a>[...] A fairly thorough explanation in 4 parts.http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/06/26/gpl-v3-the-qa-part-1-the-license/http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/06/26/gpl-v3-the-qa-part-2-developers/http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/06/28/gpl-v3-the-qa-part-3-companies/http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/06/28/gpl-v3-the-qa-part-4-odds-and-ends/ [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luis Villa&#8217;s Blog / GPL v3, the Q&#38;A: part 1- the license</title>
		<link>http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/06/28/gpl-v3-the-qa-part-3-companies/#comment-24374</link>
		<dc:creator>Luis Villa&#8217;s Blog / GPL v3, the Q&#38;A: part 1- the license</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2007 13:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/06/28/gpl-v3-the-qa-part-3-companies/#comment-24374</guid>
		<description>[...] all parts: part 1, part 2, part 3, part 4.] Microsoft&#8217;s licenses are possibly more widely used, but only by a handful of pieces [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] all parts: part 1, part 2, part 3, part 4.] Microsoft&#8217;s licenses are possibly more widely used, but only by a handful of pieces [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luis Villa&#8217;s Blog / GPL v3, the Q&#38;A: part 2- developers</title>
		<link>http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/06/28/gpl-v3-the-qa-part-3-companies/#comment-24372</link>
		<dc:creator>Luis Villa&#8217;s Blog / GPL v3, the Q&#38;A: part 2- developers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2007 13:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/06/28/gpl-v3-the-qa-part-3-companies/#comment-24372</guid>
		<description>[...] all parts: part 1, part 2, part 3, part 4.] the license has been vetted by a lot of very skilled lawyers and a fair number of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] all parts: part 1, part 2, part 3, part 4.] the license has been vetted by a lot of very skilled lawyers and a fair number of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boycott Novell &#187; Better-than-expected Welcome to the New GPL</title>
		<link>http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/06/28/gpl-v3-the-qa-part-3-companies/#comment-24358</link>
		<dc:creator>Boycott Novell &#187; Better-than-expected Welcome to the New GPL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 17:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/06/28/gpl-v3-the-qa-part-3-companies/#comment-24358</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] Part 3: Companies [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dev.wp-plugins.org/wiki/Kramer"><img src="http://tieguy.org/blog/wp-content/plugins/kramer.php?kramer=gif-icon" class="technorati-balloon" alt="Kramer auto Pingback" style="border:0;" /></a>[...] Part 3: Companies [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Sun demurs from adopting GPL v3 for OpenSolaris, keeps CDDL only &#124; Dana Gardner&#8217;s BriefingsDirect &#124; ZDNet.com</title>
		<link>http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/06/28/gpl-v3-the-qa-part-3-companies/#comment-24355</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Sun demurs from adopting GPL v3 for OpenSolaris, keeps CDDL only &#124; Dana Gardner&#8217;s BriefingsDirect &#124; ZDNet.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 14:26:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/06/28/gpl-v3-the-qa-part-3-companies/#comment-24355</guid>
		<description>[...] In Simon&#8217;s blog post he adds more insight: So the question I&#8217;m expecting to be faced with repeatedly over the next few weeks is, &#8220;will Sun use the GPLv3?&#8221; I think it&#8217;s likely we will use it, yes, but I&#8217;m not clear yet for which code and when. We&#8217;ll be carefully analysing the balance of benefits and risks in the released version of the GPLv3 and I&#8217;m not expecting to be in a position to bring a recommendation to our executive team for several weeks. I&#8217;m keen for us to take a leading position, though, even if some are sceptical of our motives. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In Simon&#8217;s blog post he adds more insight: So the question I&#8217;m expecting to be faced with repeatedly over the next few weeks is, &#8220;will Sun use the GPLv3?&#8221; I think it&#8217;s likely we will use it, yes, but I&#8217;m not clear yet for which code and when. We&#8217;ll be carefully analysing the balance of benefits and risks in the released version of the GPLv3 and I&#8217;m not expecting to be in a position to bring a recommendation to our executive team for several weeks. I&#8217;m keen for us to take a leading position, though, even if some are sceptical of our motives. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tribulaciones.org &#187; Blog Archive &#187; GPL v3 released</title>
		<link>http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/06/28/gpl-v3-the-qa-part-3-companies/#comment-24354</link>
		<dc:creator>Tribulaciones.org &#187; Blog Archive &#187; GPL v3 released</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 14:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/06/28/gpl-v3-the-qa-part-3-companies/#comment-24354</guid>
		<description>[...] 3. Companies [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 3. Companies [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GPL V3 Q&#38;A and changes within the Free Software Foundation &#171; Engage the World</title>
		<link>http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/06/28/gpl-v3-the-qa-part-3-companies/#comment-24346</link>
		<dc:creator>GPL V3 Q&#38;A and changes within the Free Software Foundation &#171; Engage the World</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 08:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/06/28/gpl-v3-the-qa-part-3-companies/#comment-24346</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] Part 3 - Companies [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dev.wp-plugins.org/wiki/Kramer"><img src="http://tieguy.org/blog/wp-content/plugins/kramer.php?kramer=gif-icon" class="technorati-balloon" alt="Kramer auto Pingback" style="border:0;" /></a>[...] Part 3 - Companies [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linux Action Forum - GPLv3 set for friday.</title>
		<link>http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/06/28/gpl-v3-the-qa-part-3-companies/#comment-24337</link>
		<dc:creator>Linux Action Forum - GPLv3 set for friday.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 19:52:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/06/28/gpl-v3-the-qa-part-3-companies/#comment-24337</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] posting his 4 part QA of the GPLv3:Part 1: On the License itselfPart 2: GPLv3 for developersPart 3: GPLv3 for companiesPart 4 has not been posted yet.Everyone should probably read those articles, it would greatly [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dev.wp-plugins.org/wiki/Kramer"><img src="http://tieguy.org/blog/wp-content/plugins/kramer.php?kramer=gif-icon" class="technorati-balloon" alt="Kramer auto Pingback" style="border:0;" /></a>[...] posting his 4 part QA of the GPLv3:Part 1: On the License itselfPart 2: GPLv3 for developersPart 3: GPLv3 for companiesPart 4 has not been posted yet.Everyone should probably read those articles, it would greatly [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
