Skip to content

scotus plunges into the youtube era, or something like that

There are some patent decisions that came out today, and some terrorism cases, which are concievably relevant to the exams I take tomorrow and Friday. So I spent a few moments poking SCOTUSblog just now.

The KSR ruling is a big deal, but I think maybe Scott v. Harris may be bigger ruling in some general, historic sense. In the case, the court links to a video on the court’s website- a full-blown leap out of good-old-fashioned text (’if it was good enough for Roman lawyers, it is good enough for us’), straight past audio, and right out into video.

For a court that still doesn’t like to have their deliberations videotaped, this is a big step. In not to long a time, many of us will be carrying video cameras around, and lots more cases are going to include video testimony. For the court to sanction video as not just a part of evidence (which has been going on for some time), but as something that can and should be referred to as a critical part of a supreme court decision, really feels like a big step towards admitting that the world is getting less and less textual. Now, if only the search engines would catch up…

[HT: SCOTUSblog.]