<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Today has been a good day so far</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tieguy.org/blog/2006/10/16/today-has-been-a-good-day-so-far/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tieguy.org/blog/2006/10/16/today-has-been-a-good-day-so-far/</link>
	<description>Ramblings on law school in New York, free software, and the spaces in between.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 11:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://tieguy.org/blog/2006/10/16/today-has-been-a-good-day-so-far/#comment-3108</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 13:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tieguy.org/blog/2006/10/16/today-has-been-a-good-day-so-far/#comment-3108</guid>
		<description>You know, I'm not a big fan of John Ashcroft, but compared to the partisan hack occupying the attorney general's office now, Ashcroft did a pretty good job. Matt Yglesias &lt;a href="http://yglesias.typepad.com/matthew/2004/11/a_qualified_def.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;made the case&lt;/a&gt; better than I could back in 2004.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, I&#8217;m not a big fan of John Ashcroft, but compared to the partisan hack occupying the attorney general&#8217;s office now, Ashcroft did a pretty good job. Matt Yglesias <a href="http://yglesias.typepad.com/matthew/2004/11/a_qualified_def.html" rel="nofollow">made the case</a> better than I could back in 2004.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luis</title>
		<link>http://tieguy.org/blog/2006/10/16/today-has-been-a-good-day-so-far/#comment-3097</link>
		<dc:creator>Luis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 01:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tieguy.org/blog/2006/10/16/today-has-been-a-good-day-so-far/#comment-3097</guid>
		<description>It is actually three years; I'll take a fourth if I get accepted into the JD-MBA joint degree program. If I wanted to do more in-depth work, I could get an LLM degree, which is an additional year. If for some reason I decide to go into academia (unlikely but certainly not impossible) that is definitely the route I'd take.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is actually three years; I&#8217;ll take a fourth if I get accepted into the JD-MBA joint degree program. If I wanted to do more in-depth work, I could get an LLM degree, which is an additional year. If for some reason I decide to go into academia (unlikely but certainly not impossible) that is definitely the route I&#8217;d take.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan Moren</title>
		<link>http://tieguy.org/blog/2006/10/16/today-has-been-a-good-day-so-far/#comment-3096</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan Moren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 01:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tieguy.org/blog/2006/10/16/today-has-been-a-good-day-so-far/#comment-3096</guid>
		<description>One question that's been on my mind since I started to read about your adventures in law school: as it is, the course is two years, but is it possible to do it over a three-year period instead?

The only thing that counts, in the end, is the bar exam if I'm not mistaken, and if you take two or three years to get there is immaterial. And with three years, you'd have more time to digest the coursework, and have more time for "electives" to go into depth on the stuff that interests you. I would assume that would make for a better lawyer. So financial considerations aside, what would the downside be of doing that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One question that&#8217;s been on my mind since I started to read about your adventures in law school: as it is, the course is two years, but is it possible to do it over a three-year period instead?</p>
<p>The only thing that counts, in the end, is the bar exam if I&#8217;m not mistaken, and if you take two or three years to get there is immaterial. And with three years, you&#8217;d have more time to digest the coursework, and have more time for &#8220;electives&#8221; to go into depth on the stuff that interests you. I would assume that would make for a better lawyer. So financial considerations aside, what would the downside be of doing that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://tieguy.org/blog/2006/10/16/today-has-been-a-good-day-so-far/#comment-3094</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 21:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tieguy.org/blog/2006/10/16/today-has-been-a-good-day-so-far/#comment-3094</guid>
		<description>Is he also going to be a musical guest?

&lt;i&gt;Let the eagle soooooar&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is he also going to be a musical guest?</p>
<p><i>Let the eagle soooooar</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
