<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Today has been a good day so far</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tieguy.org/blog/2006/10/16/today-has-been-a-good-day-so-far/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tieguy.org/blog/2006/10/16/today-has-been-a-good-day-so-far/</link>
	<description>Ramblings on software, law, and the spaces in between.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 07:48:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://tieguy.org/blog/2006/10/16/today-has-been-a-good-day-so-far/comment-page-1/#comment-3108</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 13:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tieguy.org/blog/2006/10/16/today-has-been-a-good-day-so-far/#comment-3108</guid>
		<description>You know, I&#039;m not a big fan of John Ashcroft, but compared to the partisan hack occupying the attorney general&#039;s office now, Ashcroft did a pretty good job. Matt Yglesias &lt;a href=&quot;http://yglesias.typepad.com/matthew/2004/11/a_qualified_def.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;made the case&lt;/a&gt; better than I could back in 2004.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, I&#8217;m not a big fan of John Ashcroft, but compared to the partisan hack occupying the attorney general&#8217;s office now, Ashcroft did a pretty good job. Matt Yglesias <a href="http://yglesias.typepad.com/matthew/2004/11/a_qualified_def.html" rel="nofollow">made the case</a> better than I could back in 2004.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luis</title>
		<link>http://tieguy.org/blog/2006/10/16/today-has-been-a-good-day-so-far/comment-page-1/#comment-3097</link>
		<dc:creator>Luis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 01:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tieguy.org/blog/2006/10/16/today-has-been-a-good-day-so-far/#comment-3097</guid>
		<description>It is actually three years; I&#039;ll take a fourth if I get accepted into the JD-MBA joint degree program. If I wanted to do more in-depth work, I could get an LLM degree, which is an additional year. If for some reason I decide to go into academia (unlikely but certainly not impossible) that is definitely the route I&#039;d take.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is actually three years; I&#8217;ll take a fourth if I get accepted into the JD-MBA joint degree program. If I wanted to do more in-depth work, I could get an LLM degree, which is an additional year. If for some reason I decide to go into academia (unlikely but certainly not impossible) that is definitely the route I&#8217;d take.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan Moren</title>
		<link>http://tieguy.org/blog/2006/10/16/today-has-been-a-good-day-so-far/comment-page-1/#comment-3096</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan Moren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 01:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tieguy.org/blog/2006/10/16/today-has-been-a-good-day-so-far/#comment-3096</guid>
		<description>One question that&#039;s been on my mind since I started to read about your adventures in law school: as it is, the course is two years, but is it possible to do it over a three-year period instead?

The only thing that counts, in the end, is the bar exam if I&#039;m not mistaken, and if you take two or three years to get there is immaterial. And with three years, you&#039;d have more time to digest the coursework, and have more time for &quot;electives&quot; to go into depth on the stuff that interests you. I would assume that would make for a better lawyer. So financial considerations aside, what would the downside be of doing that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One question that&#8217;s been on my mind since I started to read about your adventures in law school: as it is, the course is two years, but is it possible to do it over a three-year period instead?</p>
<p>The only thing that counts, in the end, is the bar exam if I&#8217;m not mistaken, and if you take two or three years to get there is immaterial. And with three years, you&#8217;d have more time to digest the coursework, and have more time for &#8220;electives&#8221; to go into depth on the stuff that interests you. I would assume that would make for a better lawyer. So financial considerations aside, what would the downside be of doing that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://tieguy.org/blog/2006/10/16/today-has-been-a-good-day-so-far/comment-page-1/#comment-3094</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 21:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tieguy.org/blog/2006/10/16/today-has-been-a-good-day-so-far/#comment-3094</guid>
		<description>Is he also going to be a musical guest?

&lt;i&gt;Let the eagle soooooar&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is he also going to be a musical guest?</p>
<p><i>Let the eagle soooooar</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

