<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: techcrunch for the open source desktop</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tieguy.org/blog/2006/09/01/techcrunch-for-the-open-source-desktop/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tieguy.org/blog/2006/09/01/techcrunch-for-the-open-source-desktop/</link>
	<description>Ramblings on software, law, and the spaces in between.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 18:56:37 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Quim</title>
		<link>http://tieguy.org/blog/2006/09/01/techcrunch-for-the-open-source-desktop/comment-page-1/#comment-2224</link>
		<dc:creator>Quim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Sep 2006 23:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tieguy.org/blog/2006/09/01/techcrunch-for-the-open-source-desktop/#comment-2224</guid>
		<description>After thinking several hours (I had to drive 1.400km alone) I&#039;ve decided to give it a try: http://desdeamericaconamor.org/blog/node/293</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After thinking several hours (I had to drive 1.400km alone) I&#8217;ve decided to give it a try: <a href="http://desdeamericaconamor.org/blog/node/293" rel="nofollow">http://desdeamericaconamor.org/blog/node/293</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luis</title>
		<link>http://tieguy.org/blog/2006/09/01/techcrunch-for-the-open-source-desktop/comment-page-1/#comment-2187</link>
		<dc:creator>Luis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Sep 2006 13:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tieguy.org/blog/2006/09/01/techcrunch-for-the-open-source-desktop/#comment-2187</guid>
		<description>Paul: basketball is almost always on topic for me. ;) That sucked. On the plus side, I think that set up K better to win gold in China- this team will be seriously committed for the next couple years, and we&#039;ll be able to present a more effective international team (i.e., ditch Brad Miller, bring in more shooters, and perhaps play one good lineup and have an actual bench) next time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul: basketball is almost always on topic for me. ;) That sucked. On the plus side, I think that set up K better to win gold in China- this team will be seriously committed for the next couple years, and we&#8217;ll be able to present a more effective international team (i.e., ditch Brad Miller, bring in more shooters, and perhaps play one good lineup and have an actual bench) next time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Stamatiou</title>
		<link>http://tieguy.org/blog/2006/09/01/techcrunch-for-the-open-source-desktop/comment-page-1/#comment-2172</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Stamatiou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Sep 2006 07:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tieguy.org/blog/2006/09/01/techcrunch-for-the-open-source-desktop/#comment-2172</guid>
		<description>Off-topic but.. GO GREECE!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Off-topic but.. GO GREECE!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lloyd D Budd</title>
		<link>http://tieguy.org/blog/2006/09/01/techcrunch-for-the-open-source-desktop/comment-page-1/#comment-2168</link>
		<dc:creator>Lloyd D Budd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Sep 2006 05:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tieguy.org/blog/2006/09/01/techcrunch-for-the-open-source-desktop/#comment-2168</guid>
		<description>Yeah, if you are not a cheerleader, you don&#039;t get the scoops. And that is what it is about - Hyper hyper! Dance dance!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, if you are not a cheerleader, you don&#8217;t get the scoops. And that is what it is about &#8211; Hyper hyper! Dance dance!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luis</title>
		<link>http://tieguy.org/blog/2006/09/01/techcrunch-for-the-open-source-desktop/comment-page-1/#comment-2167</link>
		<dc:creator>Luis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Sep 2006 04:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tieguy.org/blog/2006/09/01/techcrunch-for-the-open-source-desktop/#comment-2167</guid>
		<description>Stephen: Interesting; I don&#039;t find the volume all that high- but then again, I just skim the pieces, since I&#039;m not interested in most of it. Something of similar volume for the open source desktop might be overwhelming to me. (Then again, the sector isn&#039;t that active, so maybe not.) I find the analysis mostly decent- at least, typically I find it a decent first cut, even if I&#039;d disagree with it. Then again, maybe that&#039;s why I&#039;m a law student and you&#039;re an actual analyst. ;)

In response to Lloyd&#039;s post on his site: Lloyd, I&#039;d definitely select a slightly different and less-hype-y voice for an open source desktop site than we see at TechCrunch. But I don&#039;t really hold it against Tech Crunch all that much- it is an inherently hype-y sector and it would be pretty hard to avoid getting caught up in the cheerleading altogether.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stephen: Interesting; I don&#8217;t find the volume all that high- but then again, I just skim the pieces, since I&#8217;m not interested in most of it. Something of similar volume for the open source desktop might be overwhelming to me. (Then again, the sector isn&#8217;t that active, so maybe not.) I find the analysis mostly decent- at least, typically I find it a decent first cut, even if I&#8217;d disagree with it. Then again, maybe that&#8217;s why I&#8217;m a law student and you&#8217;re an actual analyst. ;)</p>
<p>In response to Lloyd&#8217;s post on his site: Lloyd, I&#8217;d definitely select a slightly different and less-hype-y voice for an open source desktop site than we see at TechCrunch. But I don&#8217;t really hold it against Tech Crunch all that much- it is an inherently hype-y sector and it would be pretty hard to avoid getting caught up in the cheerleading altogether.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch for the Open Source Desktop? at A Fool&#8217;s Wisdom</title>
		<link>http://tieguy.org/blog/2006/09/01/techcrunch-for-the-open-source-desktop/comment-page-1/#comment-2163</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch for the Open Source Desktop? at A Fool&#8217;s Wisdom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Sep 2006 01:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tieguy.org/blog/2006/09/01/techcrunch-for-the-open-source-desktop/#comment-2163</guid>
		<description>[...] Luis Villa’s Blog » techcrunch for the open source desktop [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Luis Villa’s Blog » techcrunch for the open source desktop [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lloyd D Budd</title>
		<link>http://tieguy.org/blog/2006/09/01/techcrunch-for-the-open-source-desktop/comment-page-1/#comment-2160</link>
		<dc:creator>Lloyd D Budd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Sep 2006 00:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tieguy.org/blog/2006/09/01/techcrunch-for-the-open-source-desktop/#comment-2160</guid>
		<description>Things have changed somewhat in &lt;a href=&quot;http://money.cnn.com/magazines/business2/business2_archive/2006/09/01/8384325/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Techcrunch&#039;s business&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Things have changed somewhat in <a href="http://money.cnn.com/magazines/business2/business2_archive/2006/09/01/8384325/" rel="nofollow">Techcrunch&#8217;s business</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quim</title>
		<link>http://tieguy.org/blog/2006/09/01/techcrunch-for-the-open-source-desktop/comment-page-1/#comment-2156</link>
		<dc:creator>Quim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2006 21:59:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tieguy.org/blog/2006/09/01/techcrunch-for-the-open-source-desktop/#comment-2156</guid>
		<description>Still thinking... 

I contacted them and I received a first quick reply with a doubt, a question, an observation and a request to keep them informed if the project goes on.

Still thinking...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still thinking&#8230; </p>
<p>I contacted them and I received a first quick reply with a doubt, a question, an observation and a request to keep them informed if the project goes on.</p>
<p>Still thinking&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stephen o'grady</title>
		<link>http://tieguy.org/blog/2006/09/01/techcrunch-for-the-open-source-desktop/comment-page-1/#comment-2152</link>
		<dc:creator>stephen o'grady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2006 17:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tieguy.org/blog/2006/09/01/techcrunch-for-the-open-source-desktop/#comment-2152</guid>
		<description>interesting post, Luis. i actually read TechCrunch but rarely, b/c the volume of new stuff is simply too high - and i disagree with a fair amount of the analysis. there&#039;s so much Web 2.0 stuff that my eyes just glaze over after a while.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>interesting post, Luis. i actually read TechCrunch but rarely, b/c the volume of new stuff is simply too high &#8211; and i disagree with a fair amount of the analysis. there&#8217;s so much Web 2.0 stuff that my eyes just glaze over after a while.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luis</title>
		<link>http://tieguy.org/blog/2006/09/01/techcrunch-for-the-open-source-desktop/comment-page-1/#comment-2142</link>
		<dc:creator>Luis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2006 11:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tieguy.org/blog/2006/09/01/techcrunch-for-the-open-source-desktop/#comment-2142</guid>
		<description>Would be interesting to see if a skilled journalist + Google AdWords could make this pay :) I do think someone could do a decent job of this just as a hobby- you&#039;d sacrifice the regularity of it, but it wouldn&#039;t be the end of the world.
&lt;ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Audience would be easy- frankly, the competition isn&#039;t very good, and lots of people want this. And this is a tightly connected group- if the site was good, word of mouth would spread very quickly.&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Interesting point about sources. I think one of techcrunch&#039;s strengths is that they do have a strong editorial voice, and don&#039;t just reprint press releases, so the fact that developers don&#039;t write is not much of a problem. That developers don&#039;t &lt;em&gt;promote&lt;/em&gt; is a problem, you&#039;re right- techcrunch can just sit there and let news come to them, whereas a desktopcrunch would have to go out and pound the pavement.&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;I get the sense that TechCrunch&#039;s business model is mostly advertising- see &lt;a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; href=&quot;http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/18/advertising-on-techcrunch/&quot;&gt;this post.&lt;/a&gt; I don&#039;t think you really need much capital, beyond being able to feed the author- techcrunch spread completely by word of mouth, I believe. Quim, you may be interested in 37signals&#039; &#039;&lt;a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; href=&quot;https://gettingreal.37signals.com/&quot;&gt;Getting Real&lt;/a&gt;&#039;, which is (in part) about starting a business in the Brave New World.&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;You&#039;ve noticed, I&#039;m sure, linuxtoday&#039;s particularly shameless advertising approach. :)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;em&gt;[Ed.: blah, looks like my stylesheet needs work; those should be bullet points.]&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would be interesting to see if a skilled journalist + Google AdWords could make this pay :) I do think someone could do a decent job of this just as a hobby- you&#8217;d sacrifice the regularity of it, but it wouldn&#8217;t be the end of the world.</p>
<ul>
<li>Audience would be easy- frankly, the competition isn&#8217;t very good, and lots of people want this. And this is a tightly connected group- if the site was good, word of mouth would spread very quickly.</li>
<li>Interesting point about sources. I think one of techcrunch&#8217;s strengths is that they do have a strong editorial voice, and don&#8217;t just reprint press releases, so the fact that developers don&#8217;t write is not much of a problem. That developers don&#8217;t <em>promote</em> is a problem, you&#8217;re right- techcrunch can just sit there and let news come to them, whereas a desktopcrunch would have to go out and pound the pavement.</li>
<li>I get the sense that TechCrunch&#8217;s business model is mostly advertising- see <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/18/advertising-on-techcrunch/">this post.</a> I don&#8217;t think you really need much capital, beyond being able to feed the author- techcrunch spread completely by word of mouth, I believe. Quim, you may be interested in 37signals&#8217; &#8216;<a rel="nofollow" href="https://gettingreal.37signals.com/">Getting Real</a>&#8216;, which is (in part) about starting a business in the Brave New World.</li>
<li>You&#8217;ve noticed, I&#8217;m sure, linuxtoday&#8217;s particularly shameless advertising approach. :)</li>
</ul>
<p><em>[Ed.: blah, looks like my stylesheet needs work; those should be bullet points.]</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
