<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: on blogging in the corporate open source context</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tieguy.org/blog/2006/08/27/on-blogging-in-the-corporate-open-source-context/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tieguy.org/blog/2006/08/27/on-blogging-in-the-corporate-open-source-context/</link>
	<description>Ramblings on software, law, and the spaces in between.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 20:26:41 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Luis</title>
		<link>http://tieguy.org/blog/2006/08/27/on-blogging-in-the-corporate-open-source-context/comment-page-1/#comment-2060</link>
		<dc:creator>Luis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 12:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tieguy.org/blog/2006/08/27/on-blogging-in-the-corporate-open-source-context/#comment-2060</guid>
		<description>There are times that sprints are really unbeatable, productivity-wise. And exclusivity isn&#039;t necessarily bad- there &lt;i&gt;will&lt;/i&gt; be different levels of skill and contribution, inevitably, and recognizing and motivating leaders is important too. So I wouldn&#039;t recommend completely canning them. They just have to be done well, so as not to alienate those who aren&#039;t there and create an us/them dichotomy. (Mostly, Ubuntu does this fairly well, I think. But clearly they need to recalibrate the sense of their connection to the outside world while they sprint- sprinting was absolutely not a valid excuse for ignoring community relations during the X fiasco.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are times that sprints are really unbeatable, productivity-wise. And exclusivity isn&#8217;t necessarily bad- there <i>will</i> be different levels of skill and contribution, inevitably, and recognizing and motivating leaders is important too. So I wouldn&#8217;t recommend completely canning them. They just have to be done well, so as not to alienate those who aren&#8217;t there and create an us/them dichotomy. (Mostly, Ubuntu does this fairly well, I think. But clearly they need to recalibrate the sense of their connection to the outside world while they sprint- sprinting was absolutely not a valid excuse for ignoring community relations during the X fiasco.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Mason</title>
		<link>http://tieguy.org/blog/2006/08/27/on-blogging-in-the-corporate-open-source-context/comment-page-1/#comment-2057</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Mason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 11:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tieguy.org/blog/2006/08/27/on-blogging-in-the-corporate-open-source-context/#comment-2057</guid>
		<description>&#039;in person is inherently exclusive&#039;

Agreed, that&#039;s very true.  I&#039;ve been working on getting the Spamassassin team to go back to email/IRC meets for important decision-making, rather than the occasional sprints we were doing at Apachecon hackathons.  The sprints were fun, but not really productive -- and I think they were excluding the developers who couldn&#039;t make it to Apachecon, which includes many of the core team as well as pretty much all the newbies/occasional-hacker contigent, and the latter is a very important part of open source IMO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;in person is inherently exclusive&#8217;</p>
<p>Agreed, that&#8217;s very true.  I&#8217;ve been working on getting the Spamassassin team to go back to email/IRC meets for important decision-making, rather than the occasional sprints we were doing at Apachecon hackathons.  The sprints were fun, but not really productive &#8212; and I think they were excluding the developers who couldn&#8217;t make it to Apachecon, which includes many of the core team as well as pretty much all the newbies/occasional-hacker contigent, and the latter is a very important part of open source IMO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luis</title>
		<link>http://tieguy.org/blog/2006/08/27/on-blogging-in-the-corporate-open-source-context/comment-page-1/#comment-2031</link>
		<dc:creator>Luis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 11:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tieguy.org/blog/2006/08/27/on-blogging-in-the-corporate-open-source-context/#comment-2031</guid>
		<description>Justin: The original edit, I think, tried to make it more clear that in the community context blogging is good; in the corporate context blogging is mandatory (assuming you take your responsibility to your investors seriously.) I think maybe the distinction got lost a little in the writing.

James: I know most of your events are open (like I have said repeatedly all week, Ubuntu is generally a model for this sort of thing) but I did think the sprints were the one exception- my apologies. However you slice it, though, in person is inherently exclusive, and certainly cannot be used as an excuse to forget about communicating with the outside world, whether it is one week a year or fifty-two.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Justin: The original edit, I think, tried to make it more clear that in the community context blogging is good; in the corporate context blogging is mandatory (assuming you take your responsibility to your investors seriously.) I think maybe the distinction got lost a little in the writing.</p>
<p>James: I know most of your events are open (like I have said repeatedly all week, Ubuntu is generally a model for this sort of thing) but I did think the sprints were the one exception- my apologies. However you slice it, though, in person is inherently exclusive, and certainly cannot be used as an excuse to forget about communicating with the outside world, whether it is one week a year or fifty-two.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blackshell</title>
		<link>http://tieguy.org/blog/2006/08/27/on-blogging-in-the-corporate-open-source-context/comment-page-1/#comment-2028</link>
		<dc:creator>blackshell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 09:56:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tieguy.org/blog/2006/08/27/on-blogging-in-the-corporate-open-source-context/#comment-2028</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Los blogs en un contexto corporativo open source...&lt;/strong&gt;

Así se titula una notación de Luis Villa (en inglés), que me ha parecido muy interesante, pero no solo en lo que se refiere al tema que describe el título. En primer lugar me ha gustado porque apunta con claridad a defectos......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Los blogs en un contexto corporativo open source&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Así se titula una notación de Luis Villa (en inglés), que me ha parecido muy interesante, pero no solo en lo que se refiere al tema que describe el título. En primer lugar me ha gustado porque apunta con claridad a defectos&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Henstridge</title>
		<link>http://tieguy.org/blog/2006/08/27/on-blogging-in-the-corporate-open-source-context/comment-page-1/#comment-2025</link>
		<dc:creator>James Henstridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 04:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tieguy.org/blog/2006/08/27/on-blogging-in-the-corporate-open-source-context/#comment-2025</guid>
		<description>Note that pretty much all the Ubuntu meetings are not purely Canonical staff (you were at the Sydney conference, for example).  This isn&#039;t exactly excluding the community.  At the Paris sprints, there were attempts to get some VoIP software running so that people who could not come in person could participate (admittedly this didn&#039;t seem to be that effective).

Furthermore, there is a pretty big difference between getting the developers together every 6 months is quite different to having them in the same office all the time.  The rest of the year they are communicating with each other over public channels (mailing lists, IRC, Launchpad).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Note that pretty much all the Ubuntu meetings are not purely Canonical staff (you were at the Sydney conference, for example).  This isn&#8217;t exactly excluding the community.  At the Paris sprints, there were attempts to get some VoIP software running so that people who could not come in person could participate (admittedly this didn&#8217;t seem to be that effective).</p>
<p>Furthermore, there is a pretty big difference between getting the developers together every 6 months is quite different to having them in the same office all the time.  The rest of the year they are communicating with each other over public channels (mailing lists, IRC, Launchpad).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Mason</title>
		<link>http://tieguy.org/blog/2006/08/27/on-blogging-in-the-corporate-open-source-context/comment-page-1/#comment-2022</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Mason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Aug 2006 21:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tieguy.org/blog/2006/08/27/on-blogging-in-the-corporate-open-source-context/#comment-2022</guid>
		<description>Fantastic post, Luis!

Most of this advice would apply to any bloggers working as part of an open, community-oriented software development team, not just on open source software, I think; although OSS is generally more likely to involve a community than non-OSS code is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fantastic post, Luis!</p>
<p>Most of this advice would apply to any bloggers working as part of an open, community-oriented software development team, not just on open source software, I think; although OSS is generally more likely to involve a community than non-OSS code is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Against &#124; Isriya Paireepairit</title>
		<link>http://tieguy.org/blog/2006/08/27/on-blogging-in-the-corporate-open-source-context/comment-page-1/#comment-8390</link>
		<dc:creator>Against &#124; Isriya Paireepairit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Unknown, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tieguy.org/blog/2006/08/27/on-blogging-in-the-corporate-open-source-context/#comment-8390</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;Planet Ubuntu เลย  (ผ่านไปหลายวัน Shuttleworth ถึงออกมาแถลงการณ์นิดหน่อยผ่านบล็อกตัวเอง)  Luis Villa เขียนบล็อกชี้ประเด็นว่า นี่เป็นกรณีศึกษาที่ดีของการใช้บล็อกร่วมกับการพัฒนาซอฟต์แวร์&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="technorati-balloon" href="http://www.technorati.com/cosmos/search.html?url="><img src="http://static.technorati.com/images/bubble_h17.gif" class="technorati-balloon" alt="links from Technorati" style="border:0;" /></a>Planet Ubuntu เลย  (ผ่านไปหลายวัน Shuttleworth ถึงออกมาแถลงการณ์นิดหน่อยผ่านบล็อกตัวเอง)  Luis Villa เขียนบล็อกชี้ประเด็นว่า นี่เป็นกรณีศึกษาที่ดีของการใช้บล็อกร่วมกับการพัฒนาซอฟต์แวร์</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: taint.org: Justin Mason’s Weblog</title>
		<link>http://tieguy.org/blog/2006/08/27/on-blogging-in-the-corporate-open-source-context/comment-page-1/#comment-8389</link>
		<dc:creator>taint.org: Justin Mason’s Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Unknown, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tieguy.org/blog/2006/08/27/on-blogging-in-the-corporate-open-source-context/#comment-8389</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;planned than the others I&#039;ve heard of to date, here&#039;s hoping the implementation goes as well music video: Junior Senior - &#039;Move Your Feet&#039; (YouTube) - amazing pixel art vid by www.shynola.co.uk; I&#039;ve actually seen several snippets of this elsewhere Luis Villa on blogging in the corporate open source context - great post, describing the use of blogs for cluetrain-style PR and vendor-user communication where commercial open source is involved Starfish - ridiculously easy distributed programming with Ruby - a Ruby implementation of MapReduce; missing the&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="technorati-balloon" href="http://www.technorati.com/cosmos/search.html?url="><img src="http://static.technorati.com/images/bubble_h17.gif" class="technorati-balloon" alt="links from Technorati" style="border:0;" /></a>planned than the others I&#8217;ve heard of to date, here&#8217;s hoping the implementation goes as well music video: Junior Senior &#8211; &#8216;Move Your Feet&#8217; (YouTube) &#8211; amazing pixel art vid by <a href="http://www.shynola.co.uk" rel="nofollow">http://www.shynola.co.uk</a>; I&#8217;ve actually seen several snippets of this elsewhere Luis Villa on blogging in the corporate open source context &#8211; great post, describing the use of blogs for cluetrain-style PR and vendor-user communication where commercial open source is involved Starfish &#8211; ridiculously easy distributed programming with Ruby &#8211; a Ruby implementation of MapReduce; missing the</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PLANETABLOG</title>
		<link>http://tieguy.org/blog/2006/08/27/on-blogging-in-the-corporate-open-source-context/comment-page-1/#comment-8388</link>
		<dc:creator>PLANETABLOG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Unknown, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tieguy.org/blog/2006/08/27/on-blogging-in-the-corporate-open-source-context/#comment-8388</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;  Los blogs en un contexto corporativo open source     Aug 28, 2006  -  Show original item     Así se titula una notación de Luis Villa (en inglés), que me ha parecido muy interesante, pero no solo en lo que se refiere al tema que describe el título.  En primer lugar me ha gustado porque apunta con claridad a defectos en las estrategias de algunas empresas, que pude observar en &lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="technorati-balloon" href="http://www.technorati.com/cosmos/search.html?url="><img src="http://static.technorati.com/images/bubble_h17.gif" class="technorati-balloon" alt="links from Technorati" style="border:0;" /></a>  Los blogs en un contexto corporativo open source     Aug 28, 2006  &#8211;  Show original item     Así se titula una notación de Luis Villa (en inglés), que me ha parecido muy interesante, pero no solo en lo que se refiere al tema que describe el título.  En primer lugar me ha gustado porque apunta con claridad a defectos en las estrategias de algunas empresas, que pude observar en </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
