http://tieguy.org/blog/2006/08/13/fact-checking-in-wikipediaw-the-nyt/ Ramblings on software, law, and the spaces in between. Wed, 23 May 2012 07:48:43 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://tieguy.org/blog/2006/08/13/fact-checking-in-wikipediaw-the-nyt/comment-page-1/#comment-1762 luis.villa Mon, 14 Aug 2006 21:39:40 +0000 http://tieguy.org/blog/2006/08/13/fact-checking-in-wikipediaw-the-nyt/#comment-1762 I hadn't seen that particular slide, Ben, but I've seen him talk about it before. Great image. I hadn’t seen that particular slide, Ben, but I’ve seen him talk about it before. Great image.

]]> http://tieguy.org/blog/2006/08/13/fact-checking-in-wikipediaw-the-nyt/comment-page-1/#comment-1754 Ben FrantzDale Mon, 14 Aug 2006 13:33:42 +0000 http://tieguy.org/blog/2006/08/13/fact-checking-in-wikipediaw-the-nyt/#comment-1754 Regarding fact checking in the NYT, have you seen <a href="http://flickr.com/photos/benfrantzdale/208673957/" rel="nofollow">this slide from David Weinberger's Wikimania 2006 presentation</a>? (It was in reference to the intrinsic credibility Wikipedia has because of its self-criticism, something which isn't done to the same extent for the NYT.) Regarding fact checking in the NYT, have you seen this slide from David Weinberger’s Wikimania 2006 presentation? (It was in reference to the intrinsic credibility Wikipedia has because of its self-criticism, something which isn’t done to the same extent for the NYT.)

]]> http://tieguy.org/blog/2006/08/13/fact-checking-in-wikipediaw-the-nyt/comment-page-1/#comment-1749 luis.villa Mon, 14 Aug 2006 11:51:06 +0000 http://tieguy.org/blog/2006/08/13/fact-checking-in-wikipediaw-the-nyt/#comment-1749 Having been at the talk described at the second link, he says 'there is very high probability these will occur.' Having been at the talk described at the second link, he says ‘there is very high probability these will occur.’

]]> http://tieguy.org/blog/2006/08/13/fact-checking-in-wikipediaw-the-nyt/comment-page-1/#comment-1747 e Mon, 14 Aug 2006 11:16:01 +0000 http://tieguy.org/blog/2006/08/13/fact-checking-in-wikipediaw-the-nyt/#comment-1747 Jimbo Wales defines the problems that should be solved. A precise definition allows us to see later in the future if we have solved them or not. It has nothing to do with prediction, he's not saying "those problems will be solved". Jimbo Wales defines the problems that should be solved. A precise definition allows us to see later in the future if we have solved them or not. It has nothing to do with prediction, he’s not saying “those problems will be solved”.

]]> http://tieguy.org/blog/2006/08/13/fact-checking-in-wikipediaw-the-nyt/comment-page-1/#comment-1741 Travis Reitter Mon, 14 Aug 2006 05:20:42 +0000 http://tieguy.org/blog/2006/08/13/fact-checking-in-wikipediaw-the-nyt/#comment-1741 They're right. He tries to stick to the range 25 ... 50 :) They’re right. He tries to stick to the range 25 … 50 :)

]]>