<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GPL v3 new draft released</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tieguy.org/blog/2006/07/27/gpl-v3-new-draft-released/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tieguy.org/blog/2006/07/27/gpl-v3-new-draft-released/</link>
	<description>Ramblings on software, law, and the spaces in between.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 11:08:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: BC Law IPTF Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; FSF Releases GPLv3 Discussion Draft</title>
		<link>http://tieguy.org/blog/2006/07/27/gpl-v3-new-draft-released/comment-page-1/#comment-1657</link>
		<dc:creator>BC Law IPTF Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; FSF Releases GPLv3 Discussion Draft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2006 22:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tieguy.org/blog/2006/07/27/gpl-v3-new-draft-released/#comment-1657</guid>
		<description>[...] Luis Villa provides some links to this release, and the Center for the Study of Digital Property goes in-depth and explains the changes. The main substantive change seems to be in preventing DRM from restricting the sharing or modification of GPL software. In other words you can protect and encrypt files and code, but not in a way that stops someone from viewing the source and modifying/sharing it.* It again clarifies the core of GPL&#8211;making software &#8220;free as in speech&#8221; and not making everything &#8220;free as in beer.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Luis Villa provides some links to this release, and the Center for the Study of Digital Property goes in-depth and explains the changes. The main substantive change seems to be in preventing DRM from restricting the sharing or modification of GPL software. In other words you can protect and encrypt files and code, but not in a way that stops someone from viewing the source and modifying/sharing it.* It again clarifies the core of GPL&#8211;making software &#8220;free as in speech&#8221; and not making everything &#8220;free as in beer.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

